Daniella Lewandowski claimed she was unfairly dismissed from her job when announced her pregnancy
Daniella Lewandowski, 31, was unfairly dismissed by the Bradford District Apprenticeship Training Agency when she announced she was expecting.
The expectant mother, who joined the agency in 2015, was due to renew her £33,000-a-year managerial role – but was told she would not be offered a new contract.
Tribunal Judge John Robertson awarded Ms Lewandowski, who later miscarried the child, a total of £25,000 in compensation against the agency ran by Get Bradford Working programme.
Judge Robertson ruled: "We do find the dismissal was both substantially and procedurally unfair.
"Being dismissed and losing your job because you are pregnant is a serious act of discrimination."
Ms Lewandowski said she had been told her contract, due to end on March 31, 2016, would be extended for a year, but after her pregnancy came to light she was informed this would no longer happen.
Daniella accused her former workplace of making her feel vulnerable and caused her a 'year of hell'
Being dismissed and losing your job because you are pregnant is a serious act of discrimination.
John Robertson, Tribunal Judge
The tribunal hearing in Leeds, West Yorkshire, heard Ms Lewandowski made legal claims against the agency for discrimination because of her pregnancy and for unfair dismissal.
The respondents, who denied she lost her job because of pregnancy, told the tribunal that she was dismissed because of redundancy, and that her fixed term contract had expired.
But Ms Lewandowski said that her contract had been verbally extended early in 2016 after she had been promoted to apprenticeship manager and that she had been awarded a pay increase.
Get Quotes on Home Insurance
She said she had spent five weeks "chasing" the written terms of her extended contract, which would have kept her in the job until March 2017 and that she was dismissed after announcing her pregnancy.
A court judge awarded Daniella a total of £25,000 in compensation for the unfair discrimination
Ms Lewandowski accused the respondents of making her feel vulnerable and complained she had experienced a "year of hell".
Judge Robertson said the claim was not an exaggeration and sided with the complainant.
She complained her contract had been terminated prematurely and said she had lost the trust and confidence of her employers, adding: "I loved my job – I was punished for being pregnant."
The tribunal report also says that some of the respondents from the agency had given "unreliable" evidence.
Maternity Style: Best dressed pregnant celebrities Fri, March 31, 2017
These mums-to-be are embracing their maternity wardrobe. Let's take a look at the best-dressed pregnant celebrities.
Getty 1 of 61
Pregnant Rosie Huntington-Whiteley flaunts growing baby bump in pink gown
Judge Robertson concluded that Ms Lewandowski, who unfortunately had suffered a miscarriage but had found other employment, had been treated unfairly by the respondents by way of dismissing her because of her pregnancy.
He awarded her £9,130, including interest, £15,600 for injury to feelings and £435 for loss of statutory rights.
At the time of her dismissal, the agency's board included Andrew Welsh, Group CEO of Bradford College and Councillor Susan Hinchcliffe, who is now the leader of Bradford Council but then was in charge of employment issues for the authority.
The agency which hosts offices in Bradford, West Yorks., is a joint venture between Bradford College and Bradford Council.
It describes itself as an organisation offering an "all round hassle free solution to hiring an apprentice by acting as a broker between employer and apprentice".
A spokesman for Bradford District Apprenticeship Training Agency said that it was sorry for the "unintended" distress caused to Ms Lewandowski.
He said: "We understand that this has been a very difficult case for the individual involved and are sorry for any distress caused, albeit unintended.
"We are now considering the tribunal judgment and we will look to learn lessons from it."